2 Women that took away Corona’s Crown

They say behind every man’s success is a woman. But with the recent fate of ex-Chief Justice Renato Corona, 2 woman became instruments for his downfall.

The recent decision passed by the Senate Impeachment Court convicting then Chief Justice Corona can be traced to the involvement of 2 ladies, former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales.

It’s of public knowledge that Renato Corona is a close ally of the former President. He used to work with her in Malacañang until his appointment in the Supreme Court. And who would have not remember the issue of “mid-night appointment”, when Gloria Arroyo appointed then Associate Justice Renato Corona to be the Chief Justice following the retirement of Chief Justice Reynato Puno. That appointment, which was publicly questioned by many people and civil society groups but was later upheld by the Supreme Court saying judiciary is not covered by the election ban on appointments. From then on the SC under Chief Justice Corona was dubbed as Gloria Supreme Court as it was perceived, that GMA appointed Corona to protect her from possible cases to be filed against her once she step down Malacañang. And that midnight appointment also created the gap between the Chief Justice and current President Benigno S. Aquino III who during his oath taking did follow the tradition of swearing-in with the Chief Justice and instead ask then Associate Justice and now Ombudsman Carpio-Morales to take his oath.

The ill treatment of the president to Corona continued as the President consistently pronounced his “disgust” over Corona in several public speeches. But I think the one that culminated it all which led to Corona’s impeachment was the airport drama following the TRO issued by the Supreme Court with regards to the Arroyo’s travel.

No matter how Corona and his supporters relate his impeachment to the Hacienda Luisita issue, the issue on the TRO of GMA will still weigh more. Forgive me for my word, but I don’t think many people care much about that land in Tarlac than making GMA accountable. I think Filipino’s don’t care much about this land dispute but they are more interested in finding out how this government (who during campaign promised to go out after the corrupt officials of the government) will be able to held the former President accountable from all the allegations against her. If it’s only about Luisita, do you think 188 of the Congressmen and women will support it? Should these Representatives be swayed to signed the impeachment complaint if it’s only about the President taking vengeance over their Hacienda? I don’t think so, because people’s clamor gained height during the airport fiasco. It was Corona led SC’s decision over GMA’s TRO that ignited it all. Take note of the dates when it transpired, it was after that TRO when the Lower House moved to file the complaint and collected 1/3 of the votes. If it’s not for that I don’t think there will be much support from the House of Representatives. It was his perceived bias to Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo led him to the Impeachment Trial.

During his trial, it was another woman who came out to be a big factor on his fate. As oppose to Gloria, this lady is not on his side but against his. At the start of his Impeachment Trial in Senate, it seemed that the prosecution might loose it’s case because of its lackluster performance. But not until the defense themselves presented as hostile witness, the Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales. It seemed it was a great blunder for the defense to have called the Ombudsman to the witness stand and it indeed was proven. It’s like they’ve brought a bomb that exploded in-front of their face. They seemed caught surprised about the documents brought by Carpio-Morales from the AMLC detailing Corona’s 82 Dollar bank account amounting to 10-12 million in transactional balance. Her testimony became the turning point or game changer of the whole impeachment proceedings. The documents presented by Carpio-Morales along with her Powerpoint presentation became a strong evidence that was later considered by the Senator Judges in making their conviction vote. Although the defense argued that what she presented was mere scrap of paper having no authentication marks whatsoever, still they weren’t able to debunk her testimony by mere testimonial by Chief Justice himself. They’ve tried to attack the credibility of Carpio-Morales by presenting Corona himself at the witness stand to falsify all that she said but they failed. Could they’ve presented bank documents that will counter all that Carpio-Morales has testified it could have been better. But what they did was just to bank on the credibility of Corona saying and telling his version of the story without any documentary support. If you were the judge who would you believe more, the ‘untainted’ Carpio-Morales carrying the AMLC documents on her hand, or the accused Chief Justice with no one to present but his story and his wheelchair?

It was really an unfortunate fate for the former Chief Justice Renato Corona. Two woman has caused him his crown in the judiciary. And it will be forever in his memory, that once in his lifetime his closeness to one lady and his gap with another has led to his conviction and his eventual downfall.

———————————————————————————————————————-

Day 44 : Senate Impeachment Court Convicts Chief Justice Corona (Corona Impeachment Trial)

After more than 5 months of grueling trial, the Impeachment trial of the Chief Justice Renato Corona has finally came to its end. 23 Senators are present and have voted either to convict or acquit the accused Chief Justice.

The promulgation started with the prayer of Sen. Manny Villar then followed after by the open voting in alphabetical order. Each Senators are supposed to cast their votes and chose to explain it for 2 minutes but the presiding officer Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile ruled to have no time limit for their explanation. Sen.Edgardo Angara open the voting and ended by the presiding officer Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile.

And after the voting, the Senate Impeachment Court finds the respondent Chief Justice Renato C. Corona Guilty of the Article II of the Articles of Impeachment which is Culpable Violation of the Constitution and Betrayal of Public Trust for failure to disclose his Statement of Assets Liabilities and Networth. Senator Judges who voted to convict Corona were:

1. Sen. Edgardo J. Angara
2. Sen. Allan Peter Cayetano
3. Sen. Pia Cayetano
4. Sen. Franklin Drilon
5. Sen. Francis Escudero
6. Sen. Jinggoy Estrada
7. Sen. Teofisto Guingona III
8. Sen. Gregorio Honasan
9. Sen. Panfilo Lacson
10. Sen. Lito Lapid
11. Sen. Loren Legarda
12. Sen. Serge Osmena
13. Sen. Francis Pangilinan
14. Sen. Koko Pimentel
15. Sen. Ralph Recto
16. Sen. Ramon Revilla Jr.
17. Sen. Sonny Trillanes
18. Sen. Tito Sotto
19. Sen. Manny Villar
20. Senate President Juan Ponce-Enrile

Meanwhile those who voted to Acquit the Chief Justice were

1. Sen. Joker Arroyo
2. Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago
3. Sen. Bongbong Marcos

Senate Impeachment Court’s decision final and un-appeallable thus it is expected to be executed immediately.

Day 43 : The Oral Arguments (Corona Impeachment Trial)

After 42 trial days, the Senate Impeachment court has finally came down to the final battle on the Impeachment Trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona. Both the prosecution and the defense panel laid their final oral arguments pertaining to the Impeachment Case of the Chief Justice. One hour for each side was given to voice their arguments and convince the Senator judges to vote either to convict or acquit the accused.

On the part of the prosecution the speakers were Lead Prosecutor Niel Tupas Jr., Deputy Prosecutor Rudy Fariñas and House Speaker Feliciano Belmonte. On the other side, for the defense the chosen ones were Dean Ed Delos Angeles, Atty. Dennis Manalo and Lead Defense Counsel Ret. Justice Serafin Cuevas.

The prosecution reiterated that indeed there are malice in the intention of the Chief Justice not to disclose bulk of his assets. Rep. Fariñas in fact used the word “Palusot” for the excuses or allibis of the defense pertaining to his non-disclosure of the dollar and peso accounts. He enumerated several instances of “Palusot” by Corona because he cannot find any more creadible allibi as why he did not properly declared all his assets in his SALN. On Speaker Belmonte’s closing argument he appealed to the Senator Judges to see through the character of the accused Chief Justice. He also said it seemed the Chief Justice wants to be exempted in the SALN law, which is not good because he’s the highest magistrate and he should set good example for all.

On the other hand for the part of the defense, they banked on the argument that the Chief Justice’s non disclosure of some of his assets is protected by the FCD Law. They reiterated again and again that Corona has no obligation to disclose his dollar accounts because of the provisions on the FCD Law that prohibits disclosure of the foreign currency accounts. Another argument raised by the was, Is not disclosing his dollar accounts impeachable noting his interpretation of the FCD Law? They’ve appealed to the Senator judges to give the verdict of acquittal because although the Chief Justices admitted for not disclosing his dollars, it was done in good faith.

After the oral arguments of both panels, Senator judges were given the chance to ask clarificatory questions. But none of the 23 senators except the presiding judge Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile posted questions. He asked the defense some points on the FCD Law, if there will be undue injury on the part of the Chief Justice is he will declare the dollar accounts. That line of questioning somewhat hinted JPE’s stand on the case.

The trial adjourned much earlier than usual. And tomorrow will be the verdict day where the judges will vote to convict or acquit the Chief Justice.

Day 42 : Corona Cameback, Defense Rested Its Case (Corona Impeachment Trial)

After the walkout issue last Tuesday and after signing the hospital waiver, Chief Justice Renato Corona went back to the Senate Impeachment Court to continue with his testimony and to answer questions from prosecution’s cross examination and from the Senator Judges.

When he got back to the witness stand the defense manifested that they will no longer conduct any further direct examination on the Chief Justice. Because of the manifestation and the earlier manifestation of the prosecution that if in case no additional direct questioning from the defense they will waive cross examining the witness, thus became the case. The prosecution waive their chance to cross examine the Chief Justice and just relied on the testimonies and documents presented by Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales.

During today’s trial, CJ Corona also signed and submitted (unconditionally) the waiver for his bank accounts which was later decided on by the Sen. Juan Ponce-Enrile not to act on it anymore.

Also during the break when the Senators are having caucus, the Impeachment court suddenly became a family reunion as the Basa and Corona family reconciled with each other. It was a surprise for many that after exchanges of not so good words for each other they finally patched things up and reconciled.

Several Senator judges posted questions on the Chief Justice mainly clarifying his reason why after admitting he has 3 dollar accounts did not declare it on his SALN. To which Corona answered, that those were covered by the Foreign Currency Act thus no need to disclose. During the questioning of Sen. Estrada regarding what he thought about Ombudsman Carpio-Morales motive or reason to testify against him, Corona mentioned that the current Ombudsman was never really his ally and he thought that she allowed herself to be used by Malacañang. He also told the court about Carpio-Morales’ retirement benefit request which the Chief Justice denied. That statement prompted the Ombudsman to went on a presscon to answer Corona’s accusations. In her own words she said “I am fuming mad, He’s a certified liar”. Carpio-Morales also said that the issue is not getting higher retirement benefit but Corona’s alleged cutting of benefit from the usual 1.5 million to 650 thousand pesos. She also said that she has 1 dollar account in BPI and that she disclosed it in her SALN.

The trial ended with defense submitting its formal offer of evidences, thus prompting the resting of its case. Impeachment trial will be back on Monday for the oral arguments and decision  is expected to be promulgated on Tuesday.